Ok, I don’t know how
Television earned the sobriquet of an Idiot Box. How can something as
entertaining as our beloved TV be called an Idiot Box? Since I am a very
inquisitive person, I resorted to Google to find the answer to this question,
just like any aam person. I did not
find any anecdote or incident from the past, from which this term might have
evolved. But I came across certain articles and discussions which said that it
is not the television, but the television viewers who are called idiots. This
is because people are glued to television for most hours of the day. I think
this term ‘Idiot Box’ is generalized, without considering the quality of content
which people watch on television. How disparaging is that!
The face of television
has changed over the years, from generation to generation. Television has
always been an ultimate, daily source of entertainment since my childhood,
unlike my parents’ generation who thrived on Sunday special shows like Ramanand
Sagar’s Ramayan and Mahabharat or the famous first soap
opera of Indian Television Hum Log. People
did not know TV channels other than Doordarshan, till Zee TV was launched in
1992.
I grew up watching some
really enjoyable shows like Hum Paanch, Family
No. 1, Hum Sab Ek Hain, Yeh Duniya Hai Rangeen, Shriman Shrimati and many more. These light-hearted, evergreen
mirthful shows, without even a pinch of vulgarity, always served the main
purpose for which people watch television: Entertainment. Shortly later began
the burgeoning dominance of the powerful ‘K’, from which the popular term ‘saas-bahu’ was carved out. Many other
shows followed suit and joined the league of daily soaps, having more or less
the same line of story. Sometimes I feel that these daily soaps steal the
entertainment part of television, making it dull and monotonous. Nowadays some
daily soaps are broadcasted even on weekends in the form of ‘Maha-episodes’,
not giving the audience a much-needed relief from the tiring 5-day monotony.
Family drama is the
archetype of Indian Television. Joint family system is the paradigm of Indian
culture, which is becoming a rare picture these days. Thanks to daily soaps, we
can still see joint families. We also enjoy the diversity of our country in the
form of religions, festivals and dressing styles of various states. On the other hand, I also believe that the present
daily soaps impugn the concept of joint family, because larger the family,
higher the number of conspiracies planned against the daughter-in-law. Then as
expected, the daughter-in-law boldly faces the challenges put forth and wins
hearts of other family members as well. Extra-marital affairs and false
accusations and suspicions are also common in daily soaps. All this gets
predictable in every other show. What I find most objectionable are the extreme
steps the jealous family members or mothers-in-law take, to get rid of the
daughter-in-law. In one of the Marathi serials which I watched by accident,
every episode showed new and heinous ways to kill the daughter-in-law, as
though it were a recipe book of ‘How to kill daughters-in-law’. The shocking fact
is that such serials are popular and top the TRP list! I pity the viewers with
such sordid tastes. Such programmes
should be condemned which portray women as victims of violence and injustice.
Don’t the producers or channels think about the societal impact of such violent
content? Many a times in the newspapers we read viewers expressing contempt
against serials which send a wrong message to society. When people return home
from their hectic jobs, they expect to see something cheerful, something which
can efface their worries and tensions. But what we watch are the internecine
plots or the week long funerals or mourning over the death one of the
characters. Reality shows, too, are less real and more surreal.
The new wave of shows,
which emphasize on prevalent social problems like child marriage or female
infanticide, are laudable attempts to make people aware of the gruesome
realities which still exist in our country. Shows like Halla Bol, Webbed, Crime Patrol, Satyameva Jayate deal with other issues which our country faces. I
believe such shows prove that television is an excellent source to create
awareness among the masses and channelize their thinking in the correct
direction. Innovative international adaptations like 24 that keep the audiences tied to their seats have given Indian
television a new perspective. Comedy shows like Comedy Nights with Kapil, Taarak Mehta ka Ooltah Chashma, Sarabhai v/s
Sarabhai have gained popularity for they never fail to make the viewers
laugh and thus truly understand the meaning of ‘humour’, unlike some programmes
which narrate bawdy jokes, making them unfit to watch with family. Even
today, Sarabhai v/s Sarabhai remains
one of my favourite comedy serials and I watch it when I want to have continuous
fits of laughter. Another commendable initiative which I found recently on
television was the launch of a nascent channel which broadcasts critically
acclaimed shows of our neighbouring country. I view it as an opportunity to
understand the culture and lifestyle of that nation and the rich and mellifluous usage of Hindi, besides the veritable content of the serials.
I am also a fan of
English shows like F.R.I.E.N.D.S, Suits,
House of Cards, True Detective etc. What I encounter in these serials is
that they never squander a single minute in the entire 20-minute or 40-minute
episode showing something which is irrelevant to the main plot of the show,
obviously maintaining the quality of the show. They make sure to pique viewers’
curiosity in every episode. Indian serials turn to such irrelevancy frequently
in order to constantly remain on the top of the TRP list, thus making the
programme insipid. Such serials eventually lose their viewership as well. I
find concept of ‘seasons’ in English programmes a very sensible one because it
is purely based upon the viewers’ response to the show. People look forward to watch
the recurring seasons of crème de la crème shows like Suits and House of Cards.
Each season has something promising to offer to the audience.
We know the proverb “A
man is known by the company he keeps”. Similarly television is a helpless
inanimate box who receives flak or praise depending upon the content which it broadcasts.
It is the responsibility of the channels and producers to respect the viewers’ expectation
from the shows. At the same time they should also keep in mind that television
is a powerful form of mass media, existing in every household. It is capable of
influencing the minds of millions and therefore a careful thought must be put
into, before presenting a show to its prospective viewers.
You haven't mentioned anything about "Balika Vadhu", this is pure partiality.
ReplyDeleteYes Saurabh, I haven't mentioned Balika Vadhu specifically anywhere.. But yes, its context is hidden in the sentence "The new wave of shows, which emphasize on prevalent social problems like child marriage or female infanticide...." ;-)
ReplyDelete